The Delhi High Court passed an order dismissing a plaint filed by minor plaintiffs as withdrawn, following an application under Order XXIII Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC supported by a certificate proving benefit to the minors.
Suit dismissed as withdrawn and all pending applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
Through: Ms. Neha Kapoor, Adv. (through VC) along with P-3 in person.
versus KAMAL KUMAR & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Bansal and Ms. Muskaan Mehra, Adv. for D-1. Mr. Vidit Gupta, Ms. Harleen Singh and Mr. Hareerat Singh, Advs. for D- 2 to D-10.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 14.08.2024
CS(OS) 162/2021 & I.A.36443/2024 (under Order XXIII Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2024 at 12:54:54
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
AUGUST 14, 2024/dss
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2024 at 12:54:54
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit filed by minor plaintiffs could be withdrawn for their benefit under Order XXIII Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Master Dilshe Minor & Ors.
Kamal Kumar & Ors.
Vikas Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
