Court disposed of a suit for permanent injunction after plaintiffs accepted an undertaking from defendant no.2. Pending applications rendered infructuous. Decree of injunction passed against new management.
Decree of permanent injunction passed against defendants; suit disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
PFIZER INC. & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Tusha Malhotra and Ms. Tanvi Bhatnagar, Advocates. versus
NAGESH PALEPU & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate for D-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 08.05.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 11:18:49
ANISH DAYAL, J
MAY 8, 2024/ MR/na
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 11:18:49
Pfizer Inc. & Ors.
Nagesh Palepu & Ors.
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
