The court allowed an application for exemption and, upon the plaintiff withdrawing the suit due to a lack of territorial jurisdiction, dismissed the suit with liberty to file elsewhere, ordering the return of court fees.
Suit dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file in competent court; court fee returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
versus
MERAPASHU 360 PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr.Abhay Chattopadhyay, Mr.Abhishek Kumar Shrivastava, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA O R D E R % 04.07.2024
CAV 289/2024
I.A. 32162/2024 (Exemption)
CS(COMM) 537/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2024 at 15:43:51
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
JULY 4, 2024/Arya/as
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2024 at 15:43:51
Navin Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
