The Court decreed the suit under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC in terms of a settlement agreement dated 14.02.2024 reached before mediation. The Court also directed a 75% refund of court fees to the plaintiff.
Suit decreed; 75% of court fees refunded; decree sheet drawn incorporating settlement agreement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
Through: Mr. Pravin Anand and Ms. Yamini Jaswal, Advocates
versus
TRIVENI INTERCHEM PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.....Defendants Through: Mr. Shashikant Yadav, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 14:23:47
stage of the present suit itself, in the opinion of this Court, refund of 75% of the Court fees paid on the plaint is justifiable.
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
JULY 8, 2024/akr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 14:23:47
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the suit should be decreed upon the parties arriving at an inter-party settlement.
Whether a refund of court fees paid is justifiable when settlement is reached at the initial stage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. & Anr.
Triveni Interchem Private Limited & Anr.
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
