Suit for permanent injunction restraining trademark infringement filed. Defendants undertook to remove infringing marks. Court decreed injunction per specific prayers and awarded damages of ₹1 lac.
Permanent injunction granted as per prayer clauses 65(i), (ii), (iii), & (v). Defendants to pay ₹1 lac damages within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Diva Arora and Mr. Shiv Mehrotra, Advocates.
versus
SARVAGYA GARG & ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Nikunj Jan, Advocate for defendants No. 1 and 2.
Mr. Mrinal Ojha, Mr. Debarshi Dutta, Ms. Nikita Rathi and Mr. Rishabh Agarwal, Advocates for defendant No. 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
%
O R D E R 07.11.2024
“22. Mr. Mahant, while accepting notice, on instructions, states that the aforenoted website shall be taken down within one week from today. He further states, on instructions, that Defendants No. 1 and 2 have discontinued the use of infringing marks noted above.
CS(COMM) 518/2024
Page 1 of 3
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 15:24:46
He further undertakes that, within a period of fifteen days from today, they shall remove all online and offline references to the Impugned marks.”
CS(COMM) 518/2024
Page 2 of 3
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 15:24:46
stage, the Registry is directed to issue a certificate of refund of the entire Court Fees in favour of the Plaintiff, in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, as applicable to Delhi.
AMIT BANSAL, J
NOVEMBER 7, 2024 kd
CS(COMM) 518/2024
Page 3 of 3
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 15:24:46
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to decree the suit for permanent injunction and damages in light of defendants' undertaking to discontinue infringing marks.
Khadi & Village Industries Commission
Sarvagya Garg
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
