Disposed

Ravi Panwar in Jc v. the State & Anr.

Delhi HC9 Dec 2024CRL.REV.P./98/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition under Section 138 NI Act, the High Court discharged the petitioner after the complaint was compounded following a settlement and payment of Rs. 8.25 lacs. The court also ordered the refund of a pre-trial fixed deposit.

What did the court decide?

Complaint stood compounded; petition disposed of. Petitioner directed to receive refund of Rs. 25,000 deposit with interest.

Ravi Panwar in Jc Vs the State & Anr. — Cheque Dishonour | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~33

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.REV.P. 98/2022 CRL.M.A. 21887/2022

¶4

RAVI PANWAR IN JC .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Petitioner in person.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for State with SI Sagar Navaldeep PS: Gokulpuri.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

¶9

O R D E R % 09.12.2024

¶10

Pursuant to previous order of this Court dated 12^th November, 2024, petitioner has paid the settlement amount of Rs. 8.25 lacs to respondent no. 2. 2. Both the petitioner and respondent no.2 are present in Court and are duly identified by the IO.

¶11

In these proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the petitioner was convicted vide judgement dated 21^st July, 2018, and awarded 6 months simple imprisonment and compensation of Rs. 5 lacs along with interest vide order dated 31^st July, 2018.

¶12

In view of the settlement has arrived at between the parties before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre on 13^th April, 2022, and having received the settlement amount, the complaint stands compounded. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in view of the above

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 13:01:18

¶14

settlement.

¶15

Considering that the petitioner had deposited an amount of Rs. 25,000/before the Trial Court which was kept in a fixed deposit, the same be refunded to him along with accrued interest. Petitioner shall take steps in accordance with law in this regard.

¶16

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶17

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶18

DECEMBER 9, 2024/RK/sc

¶19

Ravi Panwar in Jc v. the State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Panwar in Jc v. the State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Kumar Mittal Vs Mohinder Singh

Ravinder Kumar Vs Meenakshi Meenu & Anr.

Rahul Dedha Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Charul Bansal Vs Puneet Bansal

Sachin Rai @ Pinku Vs State NCT of Delhi

Arun Anr. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.