A criminal revision petition concerning a maintenance dispute was withdrawn by counsel because the Trial Court had passed a final maintenance order. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
RAVINDER KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ankur Singhal, Mr. Akash Mourya & Ms. Pinky Bansal, Advocates.
versus
MEENAKSHI MEENU & ANR. .....Respondent Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 06.12.2024
ANISH DAYAL, J
DECEMBER 6, 2024/ ak
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2024 at 12:56:19
RAVINDER KUMAR
MEENAKSHI MEENU
& ANR.
ANISH DAYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
