Dismissed
Amit Bhardwaj v. the State & Anr.
Delhi HCCRL.REV.P./638/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Criminal revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared on the date of hearing or the earlier occasion.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~39
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.REV.P. 638/2017 & CRL.M.A. 13997/2017, CRL.M.A. 13999/2017
¶4
AMIT BHARDWAJ .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: None.
¶6
versus
¶7
THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents
¶8
Through: Mr.Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Ms. Anjani Kumar Rai, Ms. Akanksha V. Ingole, Mr. Dilip Kumar and Mr. Nitesh Kumar Naveen, Advs.
¶9
Mr. Rohan J. Alva, Adv. (DHCLSC) for R-2.
¶10
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R
¶11
% 29.08.2024
¶12
- None appears for the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Amit Bhardwaj
- respondent
The State
Coram
AI extract
Amit Mahajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court