Raj Kumar v. CBI
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court disposed of a Criminal Revision Petition filed against a charge framing order under the PC Act and IPC. The petitioner withdrew the petition without prejudice to its rights, and the court accepted the request.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of; withdrawal recorded without prejudice to rights.
What the court decided
$~58
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.REV.P. 602/2024
RAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr.Mohit Yadav, Mr.Chirayu Bhatt and Mr.Ashutosh Mishra, Advocates
- versus
CBI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Guleria, SPP for CBI with Mr.Kanwar Karan Singh, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R % 23.09.2024
- Criminal Revision Petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner against order dated 03.02.2024 passed by learned Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI)-06, RADC, New Delhi, whereby Charge under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(a) of P.C. Act and Section 120B read with Sections 467/468/420/409/471 IPC has been framed against the petitioner.
- Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that contentions on the point of charge were not made before the learned trial court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the withdrawal of the criminal revision petition without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raj Kumar
- respondent
CBI
Coram
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court