Dismissed

Sunil @ Jhalku through Perokar v. the State of NCT through Its Chief Secretary & Anr.

Delhi HC20 Sept 2024CRL.REV.P./1113/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of a criminal revision petition challenging the framing of charge and dismissed incidental applications regarding condonation of delay without hearing the protracted arguments, noting the petitioner did not press the petition.

What did the court decide?

Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions; applications disposed of; petitioner did not press the petition without prejudice to rights.

Sunil @ Jhalku through Perokar Vs the State of NCT through Its… — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~60

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.REV.P. 1113/2024

¶4

SUNIL @ JHALKU THROUGH PEROKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yashpal Jolly, Mr. Sahil Sharma, Mr. Sathak Mann, Mr. Devrrat Sharma and Mr. Vikram Pratap Singh, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE OF NCT THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with SI Raghubir Prasad, PS Khyala.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 20.09.2024

¶11

CRL.M.A. 27133/2024

¶12

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶13

Application stands disposed of.

¶14

CRL.M.A. 27134/2024

¶15

Application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNSS’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for condonation of delay of 95 days in re-filing the petition.

¶16

For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 95 days in re-filing the petition is condoned.

¶17

Application is accordingly disposed of.

¶18

CRL.REV.P. 1113/2024 and CRL.M.A. 27131-32/2024

¶19

Criminal Revision Petition under Section 438 read with Sections 442

¶20

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 13:15:43

¶21

and 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNSS’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner challenging order dated 22.04.2024 passed by learned ASJ, West District, Tis Hazari courts, Delhi, in Session Case No. 444/2020, whereby charge was directed to be framed against the petitioner alongwith co-accused under Sections 304/34 IPC in FIR No. 132/2020, registered at PS: Khyala.

¶22

Learned APP for the State appears on advance notice.

¶23

After partly making submissions, learned counsel for petitioner does not press the petition without prejudice to rights and contentions of the petitioner.

¶24

Taking the statement of learned counsel for petitioner on record, petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶25

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J

¶26

SEPTEMBER 20, 2024

¶27

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 13:15:43

Sunil @ Jhalku through Perokar v. the State of NCT through Its Chief Secretary & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil @ Jhalku through Perokar v. the State of NCT through Its Chief Secretary & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohit Dabas & Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Ravinder Khatri and Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Rahul Jindal Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Amit Kumar Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Kamleshwar Pandey & Ors. Vs State Government NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Meena Kumari & Ors. Vs the State of (Govt. of N.C.T. Delhi) & Anr.