This order in a revision petition directs the Family Court to decide the final maintenance issue within eight months. The High Court explicitly reserves its opinion on the merits of the case and leaves all party contentions open.
Direction to the Trial Court to decide the issue of maintenance within eight months from the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~56
MUKESH GUPTA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Muzammil, Advocate
versus SONAM GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Krishna Dutt Thapliyal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
% 08.07.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 13:03:10
merits of the case.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
JULY 8, 2024 Rahul
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 13:03:10
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Trial Court should be directed to decide the final maintenance issue within a time limit.
Whether the interim maintenance fixed by the Family Court can be challenged via revision.
Mukesh Gupta
Sonam Gupta
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
