Petitioners sought withdrawal of a criminal revision petition, stating the matter had been settled between the parties. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn at petitioners' request; pending applications disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
SMT. SINKU @ NEHA & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr.R.S.Juneja, Advocate
versus
SH. SANJEEV KUMAR .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 09.08.2024
ANISH DAYAL, J
AUGUST 9, 2024 SV
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:32:48
Smt. Sinku @ Neha & Ors.
Sh. Sanjeev Kumar
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
