The High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging an interim maintenance order granted to a minor child. The Court upheld the lower court's calculation of maintenance based on the parents' respective incomes and found no infirmity in the decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
Through: Mr.Yashvir Kumar, Advocate
versus
MALWIKA SINGH AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms.Neetu Rai, Mr.Alok Kumar Rai and Mr.Jaipal, Advocates for R- and 2 with R-1 (Through VC)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 07.08.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/08/2024 at 12:24:36
maintained by her.
ANISH DAYAL, J
AUGUST 7, 2024 SV
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/08/2024 at 12:24:36
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim maintenance of Rs. 8,000/- per month to the minor child, calculated on a 40:60 income ratio, was justified.
Shardool Singh
Malwika Singh
ANR.
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
