The High Court quashed an FIR following a settlement between neighboring parties, noting the remote chances of conviction and the need to prevent misuse of court process and burden on the state exchequer.
FIR No. 464/2023 and proceedings emanating thereunder are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
DEEPANSHU AND ORS
.....Petitioners
Through: Mr.Vikas Sharma, Adv. with petitioners in person
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pradeep Gahlot, APP for the State SI Prashant PS Kanjhawala & ASI Sakha Ram PS Subzi Mandi Mr. Dinesh, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 07.08.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/08/2024 at 12:24:11
Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Consequently, the FIR No.464/2023, U/S 365/323/506/34 IPC, P.S. Kanjhawala and proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
ANISH DAYAL, J
AUGUST 7, 2024/sm
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/08/2024 at 12:24:11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR and proceedings should be quashed based on a compromise settlement between neighbors?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepanshu and Ors
State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
