The court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging an order in a maintenance matter, holding that the petition became infructuous as a final order had already been passed by the Family Court.
Present petition along-with the pending application is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~55
MANJUL KUMAR .....Petitioner
versus
ANKIT MATHUR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Mahraj Tyagi, Advocate (Through VC)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the present petition was filed for challenging the impugned order dated 18.11.2020 in Maintenance Petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. in M.T. No. 467/2018. He states, at the bar, that the final order has been passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Courts on 28.02.2022. Thus, the instant petition may be dismissed as rendered infructuous.
In view of the above, the present petition along-with the pending application, is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 18, 2024 Dy/ht..
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/11/2024 at 12:18:36
Manjul Kumar
Ankit Mathur
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
