Anoop Lohia v. State(Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition was dismissed in default as the petitioner failed to appear on two consecutive dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
ANOOP LOHIA .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms.Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC (Crl.) for the State with Mr.Abhijeet Kumar, Adv. SI Chetan Rana, PS V.K.South
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
O R D E R % 14.11.2024
None has appeared for the petitioner.
None has been appearing for the petitioner for the last two dates.
The petition is dismissed in default for non-appearance and nonprosecution.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 14, 2024 Rb/na
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/11/2024 at 14:35:40
ANOOP LOHIA
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court