Dismissed

Mohd Sauban Jirjis v. State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.

Delhi HC26 Sept 2024CRL.REV.P./100/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This revision petition sought to set aside a Sessions Court order that restricted charges to Sections 323/325 IPC instead of Sections 307/308 IPC. The High Court examined MLC records and noted the injury was simple. Finding no infirmity in the trial court's decision and noting the trial's near-completion, the petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The revision petition filed to set aside the charge sheet framing order was dismissed.

Mohd Sauban Jirjis Vs State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors. — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~28

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.REV.P. 100/2022

¶4

MOHD SAUBAN JIRJIS .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Atin Handuja, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the State with SI Akashdeep, PS Jamia Nagar. Mr. Ayyub Ahmad, Mr. Anis Ahmad and Mr. Md. Shaad Khan, Advs.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

¶9

O R D E R % 26.09.2024

¶10

This petition has been filed for setting aside impugned order dated 08^th October, 2021 where charges were not framed against the accused persons under Sections 307/308 IPC but were restricted to charges under Sections 323/325 IPC.

¶11

The MM by order dated 19^th December, 2018 had noted that because of the assault on the head of the petitioner could be fatal, therefore, matter was committed to Sessions Court.

¶12

The impugned order notes that the MLC records that the injury is simple in nature and there was no history of bleeding from the head as reported nor any neurological opinion was ultimately obtained.

¶13

The impugned order traverses the case law which was cited relating to charges under Sections 307/308 IPC, in particular underlining the issue of

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 12:32:14

¶16

requisite intention which should be gathered from the peculiar facts and circumstances.

¶17

This Court has perused the MLC and notes that the Sessions Court is not incorrect in what it has recorded. Besides, the trial is also reported to be almost complete.

¶18

There is no infirmity or illegality in the Sessions Court’s order.

¶19

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

¶20

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶21

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶22

SEPTEMBER 26, 2024/MK

¶23

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 12:32:14

Mohd Sauban Jirjis v. State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd Sauban Jirjis v. State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sh Tushar Sharma & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Ajay Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Sushant Verma & Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Parvinder Singh & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Lalit Mohan Madhan Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Raj Kumar Malik Alias Raj Malik Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.