The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition filed under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC, accepted as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the appropriate court regarding acquittal judgments relevant to the FIR.
Leave and liberty granted to equation by appropriate proceedings. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
JAMAL RANJHA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Akshay Bhandari, Mr. Anmol Sachdeva & Ms. Megha Sorha, Advocates.
versus
STATE GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC (Crl.) for the State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus & Mr. Arjun Singh Kadian, Advocates. Insp. Kuldeep Singh, P.S. Seelampur. Mr. Anand Kumar Mishra, DCP/PCR.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R % 20.02.2024
“a. Direct the Ld. Trial Court to allow the petitioner to question the witness on the aspect of cases where the Petitioner has been acquitted. b. Pass any other order this Hon‟ble Court deems fit.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/02/2024 at 10:49:42
question by way of appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
AMIT SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 20, 2024/bsr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/02/2024 at 10:49:42
Jamal Ranjha
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
