Dismissed

Sh. Mohit Mandal v. State (N.C.T Delhi) and Anr.

Delhi HC20 Feb 2024CRL.M.C./1378/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought quashing of proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. regarding an FIR for rape-related offences. Petitioner requested leave to withdraw the petition to expedite charge framing in the trial court. High Court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn; directions issued to Trial Court to conclude arguments on charge within one month.

Sh. Mohit Mandal Vs State (N.C.T Delhi) and Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~54

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CRL.M.C. 1378/2024, CRL.M.A. 5442/2024 (interim stay) &

¶4

CRL.M.A. 5443/2024 (exemption)

¶5

SH. MOHIT MANDAL ..... Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. Swarn Kumar & Ms. Jayanti Jha, Advocates.

¶7

versus

¶8

STATE (N.C.T DELHI) AND ANR. ..... Respondents

¶9

Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with W/SI Kumari Neeraj, P.S. Vasant Kunj North.

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

% 20.02.2024

¶14

The present petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeks the

¶15

following prayers:

¶16

“A) Quash the ongoing proceedings before the Ld. Sessions Judge and quash FIR No. 103 0f 2019 dt. 26.04.2019 registered at P.S. Vasant Kunj (north), South-West Delhi u/s 376D, 354 IPC in which the Petitioner is named as Accused No. 3.

¶17

B) Pass such other order or orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.”

¶18

It is pointed out that vide order dated 15.11.2019, the previous petition being CRL.M.C. 5795/2019 was dismissed as withdrawn, which records as under:

¶19

“Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition as the matter is listed for arguments on charge for tomorrow.

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/02/2024 at 10:49:21

¶22

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach this Court in case the charges are framed against the petitioner.”

¶23

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in the connected proceedings pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, the prosecutrix has not supported the case of the prosecution. It is further submitted that since then no order on charge has been passed by the learned Trial Court. It is pointed out that the matter is again fixed before the learned Trial Court for consideration on point of charge on 20.02.2024, i.e., today.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner, without prejudice to the rights and contentions latter, seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with a prayer for expeditious hearing of the present FIR before the learned Trial Court.

¶25

Leave and liberty granted.

¶26

The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

¶27

The learned Trial Court is directed to ensure that the arguments on point of charge be concluded within a period of 01 month from today.

¶28

Order be communicated to learned Trial Court for necessary information and compliance.

¶29

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶30

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶31

FEBRUARY 20, 2024/bsr

¶32

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/02/2024 at 10:49:21

Sh. Mohit Mandal v. State (N.C.T Delhi) and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sh. Mohit Mandal v. State (N.C.T Delhi) and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashish Malik & Anr. Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Rohit Kumar Gupta & Ors. Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Deepak & Anr. Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Nanak Chand Sharma Vs the State

Jamal Ranjha Vs State Govt.of NCT of Delhi

Pradyumna Pujari & Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.