Rachana Yadav v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition withdrawn on request of counsel following filing of charge-sheet; dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
RACHANA YADAV .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shubham Sagar & Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocates
versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State with Mr. Sagar Mehlawat and Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advs. with SI Lalit PS. Bindapur.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 05.09.2024
ANISH DAYAL, J
SEPTEMBER 5, 2024/sm
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/09/2024 at 12:28:00
RACHANA YADAV
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court