Writ petition sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 376/511 IPC among others; after charge-sheet, charges under Sections 376/511 were dropped and trial commenced on remaining sections. The High Court declined to quash, noting the FIR statements and ongoing trial, and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
MANISH KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. D.B. Yadav & Mr. Sauraj Yadav Advocates versus THE STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC (Crl.) with Ms. Anvita Bhandari, Ms. Charu Sharma, Mr. Nikunj Bindal, Mr. Arjit Sharma & Mr. Baibhav Vats, Advocates WSI Soni Lal, PS Nabi Karim Mr, Sarveesh Kumar, Adv. for R-2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R % 05.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/09/2024 at 12:28:11
application.
ANISH DAYAL, J
SEPTEMBER 5, 2024/sm
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/09/2024 at 12:28:11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No.256/2019 PS Nabi Karim and related proceedings should be quashed as a case of false implication.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manish Kumar
The State
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
