Allowed

Mohit v. State of NCT and Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC2 Feb 2024BAIL APPLN./941/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In bail petitions filed for anticipatory bail, the Court directed that if petitioners are arrested, they shall be released on bail subject to furnishing personal and surety bonds of Rs. 20,000/- each and joining further investigation.

What did the court decide?

Directed that if petitioners are arrested, they be released on bail subject to furnishing personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- each and a surety bond of the like amount.

Mohit Vs State of NCT and Delhi & Anr. — Anticipatory Bail | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~5 & 6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

BAIL APPLN. 941/2023 MOHIT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Adv. versus

¶4

STATE OF NCT AND DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for State with SI Yudhveer PS Hauz Khas, Delhi 6. + BAIL APPLN. 966/2023 MAHENDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT AND DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for State with SI Yudhveer PS Hauz Khas, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

¶5

O R D E R % 02.02.2024

¶6

The present petitions have been filed seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 53/2023 under Sections 343/341/34 IPC registered at PS Hauz Khas, New Delhi.

¶7

While issuing notice vide order dated 22.03.2023 in the petitions, the petitioners were granted interim protection subject to their joining investigation.

¶8

This is a digitally signed order.

¶9

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2024 at 12:42:47

¶10

The learned APP for the State, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, who is present in Court, fairly states that the petitioners have joined investigation and they are no more required for any further investigation. However, he further adds that there is a complaint filed by the complainant vide DD 2A dated 14.02.2023 wherein it has been alleged that threats have been extended by the associates of the present petitioners to the complainant.

¶11

However, on a query posed by the Court, the learned APP apprises the Court that the investigation into the said complaint is still pending.

¶12

Considering the fact that the petitioners have joined investigation and they are no more required for further investigation and the complaint alleging threat is almost one year old i.e. prior to grant of interim protection to the petitioners and the investigation qua the said complaint has not made any headway, it is directed that in the event of petitioners being arrested, they be released on bail subject to their furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- each and a surety bond of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer / Arresting Officer, further subject to the condition that they will join investigation as and when directed by the Investigating Officer concerned.

¶13

The petitions stand disposed of.

¶14

Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

¶15

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶16

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶17

FEBRUARY 2, 2024/ N.S. ASWAL

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2024 at 12:42:47

Mohit v. State of NCT and Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohit v. State of NCT and Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sajid & Ors. Vs State of N.C.T. Delhi & Anr.

Kamran Vs the State Govt.of NCT of Delhi

Kamal Sharma @ Kake Vs State

Shri Kishan @ Bablu Vs State Gnct of Delhi and Anr.

Sonu Banjara Vs NCT of Delhi

Ankur Shrivastav Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)