Allowed

Sh U.K Jain & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC7 Feb 2024CRL.M.C./898/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the petitioner's appeal against an order closing cross-examination. The court granted one opportunity to cross-examine the complainant on the next hearing date, subject to the payment of an additional Rs. 10,000 cost.

What did the court decide?

Granted one opportunity to cross-examine the complainant on 09.02.2024, subject to payment of further cost of Rs. 10,000.

Sh U.K Jain & Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Cheque Dishonour | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~94.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 898/2024 and CRL.M.A. 3601/2024

¶4

SH U.K JAIN & ANR. ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. A Misha and Mr. Nidish Gupta, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Respondent No.2 in person.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 07.02.2024

¶10

By way of present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.] the petitioners seek to assail the order dated 25.08.2023 passed by the learned MM (NI Act-04) (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CT. Case No. 23775 of 2016, whereby the right to cross-examine the complainant was closed and cost of Rs.10,000/- had also been imposed.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in the Trial Court, notice under section 251 Cr.P.C. was framed on 01.06.2022 whereafter, the petitioners filed an application under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 seeking compounding. The application was premised on the ground that the entire debt already stood discharged. The said application however, came to be dismissed on 01.04.2023. It is stated that besides the petitioners, there are other accused persons also and that complainant has already been cross-examined on behalf of the accused no.6. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the NBWs issued

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:57:50

¶14

against the petitioners were stayed as the counsel had noted the wrong date in his diary.

¶15

He further, on instructions, states that the petitioners undertake to appear before the Trial Court on the next date of hearing i.e., on 09.02.2024, and cross-examine the complainant. He prays that one opportunity may be granted for the said purpose.

¶16

The complainant/respondent no.2, who is present in person, states that he has no objection in case one opportunity is granted, however, the cost as imposed by the Trial Court be directed to be paid.

¶17

Considering the averments in the application, and no objection given by the complainant, the present petition is allowed and petitioners are granted one opportunity to cross-examine the complainant on the next date of hearing, subject to payment of further cost of Rs. 10,000/-.

¶18

The entire cost of Rs. 20,000/- be paid to the complainant on the next date of hearing.

¶19

The present petition stands disposed of.

¶20

The copy of this order be communicated to the concerned Trial Court. Dasti

¶21

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶22

FEBRUARY 7, 2024 aks

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:57:50

Sh U.K Jain & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sh U.K Jain & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanhiya @ Kanheya and Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Mohit and Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Parvesh Kumar Vs Commissioner of Police & Ors.

Nishit Singh Vs State NCT of Delhi

Ramesh Giri & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Micromax Informatics Limited Vs M/S Wave Mobiles