Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of an FIR for assault registered after a settlement between parties. With victims present and confirming free-will consent to the compromise deed, the court found no useful purpose in continuing proceedings and quashed the FIR.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~94
KANHIYA @ KANHEYA AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate with petitioners in person versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Kapil and SI Hareati Lal Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R
CRL.M.A. 3724/2024 (exemption)
CRL.M.C. 925/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:57:47
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
FEBRUARY 6, 2024 na
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:57:47
1 issue framed by the court
Should FIR No. 10/2022 under Sections 308/34 IPC be quashed on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kanhiya @ Kanheya and Ors
The State NCT of Delhi
Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
