Petitioners sought to withdraw their writ petition along with a connected criminal miscellaneous application, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition if necessary. The court granted this request.
dismissal of the petition and the pending application CRL.M.A. 7385/2023 with liberty to file a fresh petition if necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
Through: Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Mr. Ratnil Chauhan, Mr. Kabir and Mr. Akash Pratap Singh, Advocates
UNION TERRITORY OF LADAKH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
MARCH 11, 2024/ns
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/03/2024 at 11:39:22
Neeraj Kumar & Ors.
Union Territory of Ladakh & Ors.
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
