Sameer Mahandru v. Directorate of Enforcement
Delhi HCBAIL APPLN./621/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bail application listed on office note regarding non-payment by the petitioner of Rs. 23,18,665/- towards cost of custody parole. Counsel sought time to take instructions; matter re-notified.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~72
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- BAIL APPLN. 621/2024
¶4
SAMEER MAHANDRU .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocate.
¶6
versus
¶7
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Special Counsel, Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel & Mr. Kartik Sabharwal, Advocate.
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
¶9
O R D E R % 04.09.2024
¶10
- The matter has been put on office note, wherein it is stated that an outstanding amount of Rs. 23,18,665/- towards cost of custody parole till 02.08.2024 has not been paid by the petitioner.
¶11
- Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to take instructions or respond to the payment of Rs. 23,18,665/-.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sameer Mahandru
- respondent
Directorate of Enforcement
Coram
AI extract
Neena Bansal Krishna
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court