Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition along with pending connected applications. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn. No legal propositions established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC for UOI Inspector Jagdeep Singh, P.S. Hazrat Nizamuddin Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for the State Ms. Mamta R. Jha, Mr. Rohan Ahuja, Ms. Shruttima, Ms. Anishi Sodani and Mr. Rahul Chowdhary, Advocates for R-3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
MAY 03, 2024/ns
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2024 at 14:52:43
Tufail Khan
Union of India
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
