A criminal matter under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash an order. The court held that since prosecution evidence was completed, defence issues should be raised in the final statement. The petition was disposed of with liberty to object during trial.
Petition disposed with liberty to raise objections during trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
versus
MOHD. IQBAL & ANR .....Respondents Through: Counsel(Appearance not given)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R
% 04.09.2024
Since the prosecution evidence has already been completed, the defences which are being agitated in the present case be taken up in the statement of accused/final arguments.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
SEPTEMBER 4, 2024/PT
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2024 at 12:13:10
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court's order dismissing cross-examination rights should be set aside under Section 482 CrPC.
Whether defence arguments can be raised during the final statement of the accused.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Alamgir Khan & Anr
Mohd. Iqbal & Anr
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
