The petition is disposed of in view of the pending consideration of an application for compounding of the offence filed before the trial court by the petitioner, who is the authorized signatory. The petitioners are left at liberty to file an appropriate petition if compounding is not accepted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
CRL.M.A. 27978/2023 and CRL.M.A. 27979/2023
KIRAN PAISAL & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Partho Bhattacharya & Ms.Spriha Bhattacharya, Advocates
versus
M/S RAMKRIPA AGRO FOODS PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr.Krishan Kumar and Mr.Shivam Bedi, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R % 01.08.2024
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
AUGUST 1, 2024
na
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 07:43:04
KIRAN PAISAL & ANR.
M/S RAMKRIPA AGRO FOODS PVT LTD
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
