The court disposed of the anticipatory bail application after the State submitted that the petitioner was only called for investigation and no material existed for apprehension of arrest at that stage. The Investigating Officer agreed to provide a 7-day notice before any potential arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~56
GURPREET SINGH BHANGOO .....Petitioner
Through: Mr.Jay Savla, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Jasdeep, Mr.Vikram, Ms.Amanat and Ms.Kenisha, Advocates
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for State with Insp. Ram Niwas, DIU, New Delhi
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 02:10:15
called for investigation and that at this stage, there is no material for the applicant to apprehend any arrest. He submits that in case any material comes on record and the Investigating Officer intends to arrest, he will give a notice of 7 days to the applicant.
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
AUGUST 1, 2024 na
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 02:10:15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail given the status of investigation and apprehension of arrest.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gurpreet Singh Bhangoo
State (NCT of Delhi)
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
