Allowed

Mohammad Aslam Alias Aslam Saifi & Ors. v. the State & Anr.

Delhi HC18 Sept 2024CRL.M.C./7372/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi quashed an FIR registered under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC. The court held that since the parties to the matrimonial dispute had reached an amicable settlement, no useful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 683/2023 and proceedings emanating therefrom quashed. Parties bound by settlement terms.

Mohammad Aslam Alias Aslam Saifi & Ors. Vs the State… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~77

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 7372/2024

¶4

MOHAMMAD ASLAM ALIAS ASLAM SAIFI & ORS.

¶5

.....Petitioners

¶6

Through: Mr. Shahid Ahmed and Ms. Shabnam (D/11072/22), Advocates.

¶7

versus

¶8

THE STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. Mr. Yunus Khan, Advocate for the Complainant.

¶9

ASI Sushil Kumar Tyagi (2271/NE), PS Dayalpur

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

% 18.09.2024 CRL.M.A. 28120/2024 (Exemption)

¶13

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶14

CRL.M.C. 7372/2024

¶15

The present petition has been filed for quashing FIR No.683/2023 dated 04.11.2023, registered at Police Station Dayal Pur for offences under Section 498A, 406, 34 IPC on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. The present proceedings arise out of a matrimonial dispute between the parties.

¶16

The principal ground on which the present petition has been filed is that the parties have amicably resolved their disputes by a settlement agreement dated 10.06.2024.

¶17

The parties have joined the proceedings today and they have been

¶18

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:37:20

¶19

identified by their respective Counsels and the Investigating Officer.

¶20

Respondent No.2/Complainant has filed an affidavit affirming the fact that all the disputes with the Petitioners have been amicably settled. Respondent No.2 states that she has settled all her disputes with the Petitioners out of her own free will, without pressure, coercion or undue influence.

¶21

Considering the fact that the dispute is a matrimonial dispute and the parties have amicably settled their disputes, the present case is squarely covered under the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303 . In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the present proceedings. Resultantly, FIR No.683/2023 dated 04.11.2023, registered at Police Station Dayal Pur for offences under Section 498A, 406, 34 IPC and the proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. The parties shall remain bound by the terms of the settlement and the undertaking given to the Court.

¶22

The petition stands disposed of with the above observations along with pending application(s), if any.

¶23

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

¶24

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024 Rahul

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:37:20

Mohammad Aslam Alias Aslam Saifi & Ors. v. the State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Aslam Alias Aslam Saifi & Ors. v. the State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rashmi Chhabra & Anr. Vs State

Rajveer Vs State (Govt.of NCT of Delhi)

Ravi Gulati & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Mr Ram Kumar Verma Proprietor Verma Bheej Bhandar Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Sh Ashish Alias Shanky Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

Minaxi and Ors. Vs State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi) and Ors.