Disposed

Minaxi and Ors. v. State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi) and Ors.

Delhi HC18 Sept 2024W.P.(CRL)/2880/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Widow of a murder victim and others sought police protection from respondents accused of the murder. The Court directed petitioners to meet the SHO, obtain beat constables' mobile numbers, and required daily constable visits for their safety.

What did the court decide?

Directions to SHO to provide beat constables' contact numbers and ensure daily constable visit to petitioners' house; liberty to re-approach Court granted.

Minaxi and Ors. Vs State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi) and… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~82

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 2880/2024

¶4

MINAXI AND ORS. .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr. Lokesh Kumar Mishra, Mr. Sumit Kumar, Mr. Haider Khan, Mr. Himanshu Sharma and Mr. Vinay Kumar Sahu, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE (G.N.C.T. OF DELHI) AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State with Ms. Priyam Agarwal and Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Advocates.

¶8

Insp. Parmendra Singh, PS SP Badli and SI Satyander, PS SP Badli

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶10

% 18.09.2024 CRL.M.A. 28093/2024 (Exemption)

¶11

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

W.P.(CRL) 2880/2024

¶13

Petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:

¶14

“ i. pass an protection order to the petitioners, thereby directing the respondent No.1 to ensure protection of life and liberty of the petitioners from the respondents No.2 to 5; AND

¶15

ii. direct the respondents No.2 to 5 not to indulge in any kind of violation against the petitioners and not to disturb the peaceful life of the petitioners; AND

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:47:31

¶17

iii. Pass any other order(s), which this Hon’ble court may deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case be also passed in favour of the petitioners, in the interest of justice ”

¶18

It is stated that Respondents No.2 to 5 are the accused in the murder of the husband of the Petitioner No.1 herein. It is pertinent to mention here that Respondent No.2 is the real brother of the deceased husband of Petitioner No.1 herein.

¶19

This Court had requested the SHO, Samaypur Badli to be present in Court today. The concerned SHO is present in Court.

¶20

Petitioners are directed to meet the SHO at 04:00 PM today and the SHO is directed to provide the mobile numbers of two beat constables as well as his mobile number to the Petitioners herein. The SHO is also directed to ensure that one constable visits the house of the Petitioners at least once a day to ensure their safety.

¶21

With these directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications, if any.

¶22

Liberty is granted to the Petitioners to approach this Court in future if need so arises.

¶23

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

¶24

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024 Rahul

¶25

Minaxi and Ors. v. State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Minaxi and Ors. v. State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Musheer Khan & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Shri Sachin Sirohi & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Sunil Kothiwal Vs the Commissioner Exicise Ent and Luxury Tax Department

Minor S Thr Her Mother a Vs State & Anr.

Sh. Bali Ram Sharma & Anr. Vs the State , Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Hari Datt Sharma Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Manoj Jain and Ors. Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.

Tarun Miglani Vs the State & Anr.

Rashmi Chhabra & Anr. Vs State

Rajveer Vs State (Govt.of NCT of Delhi)

Ravi Gulati & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Mr Ram Kumar Verma Proprietor Verma Bheej Bhandar Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Sh Ashish Alias Shanky Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

Mohammad Aslam Alias Aslam Saifi & Ors. Vs the State & Anr.