Petitioners withdrew the present petition. The disposal was based on the fact that the closure report had been filed and accepted by the Trial Court. The State accepted the withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
JITU SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate alongwith Petitioner No.1 in person.
versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Peswani, Advocate for Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC for State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
Learned counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the present petition, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection since the closure report has been filed and has been accepted by the learned Trial Court.
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn, in view of the aforesaid fact.
JYOTI SINGH, J
JANUARY 12, 2024/pa
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:17:40
JITU SINGH & ORS.
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR.
JYOTI SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
