The High Court quashed an FIR registered under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC after accepting a settlement where an outstanding amount was tendered. The court noted the marriage had ended in divorce and conviction prospects were remote, making continuation a misuse of court process.
FIR No. 325/2013 and proceedings quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~70
BIJENDER SHOKKEN AND ORS .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Amit Saini, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocates along with petitioner in person.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for State with SI Manoj Kumar, PS: Nihal Vihar.
Mr. Vijay Kasana and Mr. Jai Dev Solanki, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 28.08.2024
CRL.M.A. 25545/2024 ( Exemption )
CRL.M.C. 6691/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/09/2024 at 12:18:02
ANISH DAYAL, J
AUGUST 28, 2024/RK
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/09/2024 at 12:18:02
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC should be quashed based on aamicable settlement between the parties?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
BIJENDER SHOKKEN AND ORS
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
