The High Court quashed an FIR registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 DP Act, noting a settlement between parties, payment of compensation, and the remoteness of conviction, thereby preventing misuse of the court process.
Quashing of FIR No. 298/2017 and proceedings emanating therefrom.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~65
SHAMSHAD AND OTHERS .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mohak Jain, Advocate along with petitioner no 1 to 6.
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. S. Gupta, Advocate for complainant with complainant. Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for State with SI Pankaj Kumar, PS: Jyoti Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R
% 14.08.2024
CRL.M.A. 24161/2024 ( Exemption )
CRL.M.C.6317/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2024 at 14:21:15
Courts, which is on record of this Court.
ANISH DAYAL, J
AUGUST 14, 2024/RK
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2024 at 14:21:15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR and proceedings should be quashed in light of a valid settlement and remote chances of conviction.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SHAMSHAD AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
ANISH DAYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
