Dismissed

Rakesh @ Jatti v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Delhi HC14 Aug 2024BAIL APPLN./2418/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application seeking extension of interim bail due to the missing son of the petitioner, the Delhi High Court rejected the plea on the grounds of sufficient legal concession already granted for family reasons, while directing police to trace the missing son.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail extension application dismissed; direction issued to SHO to trace missing son Sagar.

Rakesh @ Jatti Vs State (Nct of Delhi) — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~28

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 2418/2024

¶4

RAKESH @ JATTI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Avi Kalra, Mr. Prateek Lakra, Ms. Deepshikha, Mr. Devesh Chauhan, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State and Insp. O.P. Mandal, PS Raj Park, Delhi.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 13.09.2024

¶11

CRL.M.A. 27925/2024 in BAIL APPLN. 2418/2024

¶12

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

Application stands disposed of.

¶14

CRL.M.A. 27924/2024 in BAIL APPLN. 2418/2024

¶15

The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant/accused seeking extension of interim bail for 15 days under Section 439 Cr.P.C. r/w Section 482 Cr.P.C. on the ground of the applicant’s missing son.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in bail application 2418/2024 the interim bail was granted on 14.08.2024 for the demise of the son of the petitioner for 15 days from 20.08.2024 to 04.09.2024. Learned counsel submits that in CRL.M.A. 26692/2024 on 04.09.2024 the bail was

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2024 at 12:08:35

¶19

extended till 13.09.2024. However, learned counsel submits that in the meantime another son of the petitioner namely Sagar who was admitted to rehabilitation facility on account of drug and substance addiction have gone missing since 03.09.2024. Learned counsel submits that regarding this general report on 09.09.2024 has already been lodged. Learned counsel submits that therefore interim bail may further be extended.

¶20

I consider that the petitioner has already been given concession of interim bail on the death of his son and for performing the last rites of his son.

¶21

In view of the above facts and circumstances, the present application is dismissed.

¶22

However, concerned SHO is directed to take all steps for tracing out Mr. Sagar, son of the applicant.

¶23

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J

¶24

SEPTEMBER 13, 2024/AR/KR..

¶25

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2024 at 12:08:35

Rakesh @ Jatti v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh @ Jatti v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shikher Arora and Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Child M through His Legal Guardian Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Ajay Kumar Vs the State Govt of NCT Delhi and Anrs

Shamshad and Others Vs the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Aarti Vs State NCT of Delhi

Rohit & Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.