Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their petition before framing of charges, with liberty to raise all arguments at the charge-framing stage. The court granted permission and disposed of the petition as withdrawn along with pending applications. No substantive ruling was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
DR ABHINAV AGGARWAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Seema Seth, Mr. Satish Panchal, Ms. Poorvi Jain and Ms. Muskaan Deswal, Advocates
versus
THE STATE ( GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
.....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for the State with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocates. WSI Damini, PS Vikaspuri
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD O R D E R
% 23.09.2024
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 hsk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:32:45
Dr Abhinav Aggarwal & Ors.
The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Anr.
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
