Disposed
Deepak Udar v. State & Anr.
Delhi HCCRL.M.C./3869/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petition to quash FIR under Sections 420 and 406 IPC based on settlement; since the settlement was stayed by a coordinate bench, withdrawal sought and granted.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw petition with liberty to approach court if stay on settlement is vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~30
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.M.C. 3869/2022
¶4
DEEPAK UDAR .....Petitioner
¶5
- Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Kampani, Advocate
¶6
versus
¶7
STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP for the State. Mr. Joby P. Varghese, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. SI Ramavtar, PS Hauz Khas.
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
¶9
- O R D E R
¶10
- % 23.09.2024
¶11
- The Petitioner has approached this Court for quashing FIR No.1408/2014 dated 31.12.2014 registered at Police Station Hauz Khas for offences under Section 420 & 406 IPC on the ground that the parties have entered into a settlement.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Deepak Udar
- respondent
State
- respondent
Respondent No. 2 (Complainant)
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court