The Delhi High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the petition under Section 482 Cr.PC for quashing of FIR. Liberty was granted to approach the trial court for discharge. The application was disposed of.
Petition permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to approach trial court for discharge; matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
SANJAY PARSOYA ..... Petitioner
Through Ms. Komal Chhibber and Mr. Sahil Kalra, Advocates.
versus
STATE OF DELHI AND OTHERS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 02.07.2024 CRL.M.A.18764/2024 (Exemption)
CRL.M.C. 4911/2024 (under Section 482 Cr.PC filed on behalf of the Petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 0843/2021)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2024 at 15:43:13
so arises.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
JULY 2, 2024/RS
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2024 at 15:43:13
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to permit the withdrawal of the petition for quashing FIR under Section 482 Cr.PC and to dispose of the matter accordingly.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Parsoya
State of Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
