Petition to quash a rash-driving FIR arising from a road accident, based on settlement between petitioner and injured complainant. The State raised no objection. The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
MUKUND BERIWAL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person.
versus
STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Raj Kumar, APP for the State with IO / ASI Yogeshwar, P.S. Delhi Cantt.
Mr. N.S. Chechi and Mr. Virendra Kumar Singh, Advocates for R-2 with R-2 in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 08.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:26:51
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:26:51
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
FEBRUARY 8, 2024 /kct
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:26:51
1 issue framed by the court
Should FIR No.374/2023 under Sections 279/337 IPC be quashed given the parties' settlement and the complainant's no-objection?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
MUKUND BERIWAL
STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI
Respondent No. 2 (Complainant)
VIKAS MAHAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
