Disposed

Ritu Issar v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC19 Dec 2024W.P.(CRL)/3955/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking habeas corpus production of the petitioner's husband alleged illegally detained by relatives. The husband appeared in court alive and residing freely, so no further orders were needed; parties were referred to the High Court Mediation Centre for matrimonial disputes.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed; parties referred to Delhi HC Mediation and Conciliation Centre on 23.12.2024.

Ritu Issar Vs State NCT of Delhi and Ors. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~53

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 3955/2024 & CRL.M.A. 38229/2024

¶4

RITU ISSAR .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan Jain and Mr. Himanshu Jain, Mr. Narender Kumar and Mr. Siddharth Jain, Advocates along with Petitioner in person.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

¶8

.....Respondents

¶9

Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Criminal) for the State with Ms. Priyam Aggarwal & Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Advocates.

¶10

Insp. Anurag and SI Manoj Kumar, P.S. Mehrauli.

¶11

Mr. Chandan Issar/husband of the Petitioner in person.

¶12

CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

% 19.12.2024

¶15

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶16

The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the BNSS has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner-Ms. Ritu Issar, seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus for production of her husband-Mr. Chandan Issar.

¶17

Various allegations have been made in the petition, inter alia, that the husband of the Petitioner has been illegally detained by some relatives, i.e. , Respondent Nos. 2 to 8.

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 12:16:32

¶20

Ld. Standing Counsel (Criminal) for the State has handed over a status report dated 18th December, 2024 and the same is taken on record. As per the said report, there is a matrimonial discord between the Petitioner and her husband. It is stated that the husband is living in Plot no. 370, Gali no. 25, Chattarpur Pahari, New Delhi.

¶21

The Petitioner’s husband is present in Court and submits that he is living in the aforesaid property and a portion of the same has been given on rent to his friend, Respondent No. 8/Mr. Amit Kumar.

¶22

The Court has interacted with the husband. Since the husband of the Petitioner has appeared before this Court, no further orders are called for. 7. However, it is submitted by the ld. Counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner/wife wishes to avail mediation services of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (hereinafter “ Mediation Centre ”) in order to try and resolve their matrimonial disputes.

¶23

Accordingly, independent of this petition, the Petitioner and her husband-Mr. Chandan Issar, may appear before the Mediation Centre on 23^rd December, 2024 at 03:00 PM to attempt resolution of these disputes.

¶24

With the aforesaid directions, the petition is disposed of along with pending applications, if any.

¶25

Copy of the order be sent to the Secretary, Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre for necessary information and compliance.

¶26

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J

¶27

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶28

DECEMBER 19, 2024/ bsr/ms

¶29

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 12:16:32

Ritu Issar v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ritu Issar v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sadhu Singh Vs the State of NCT of Delhi through Sho, P. S. Igi Airport

Varun Maurya Vs State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.

Narinder Kumar Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Parvinder Singh Vs Union of India & Anr.

Manish Chand Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Shashi Parnami Vs State

Sudeep Roy and Anr. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Jawahar Singh Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Others

The Commisioner of Central Tax, Cgst Delhi East Vs M/S Jmd Limited

Parvinder Singh Vs Union of India & Anr.

M/S Innovative Crafts Vs Deputy Commissioner of Customs (Refund), Inland Container Depot, Patparganj, New Delhi

Bonanza Enterprises Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Customs & Anr.

Shri Balaji Enterprises Vs Additional Director General New Delhi & Ors.

Umesh Vs State of NCT of Delhi