Dismissed

M/S Innovative Crafts v. Deputy Commissioner of Customs (Refund), Inland Container Depot, Patparganj, New Delhi

Delhi HC18 Dec 2024W.P.(C)/16396/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus for refund of a pre-deposit amount of Rs. 5,96,000 with interest. The court held the petition infructuous after the respondent, ICD Patparganj, sanctioned the refund and interest via an order dated 13 December 2024, directing payment within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.

M/S Innovative Crafts Vs Deputy Commissioner of Customs… — Customs and Excise | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~58

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 16396/2024

¶4

M/S INNOVATIVE CRAFTS .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Akhil Krishan Maggu, Adv. versus

¶6

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (REFUND), INLAND CONTAINER DEPOT, PATPARGANJ, NEW DELHI

¶7

.....Respondent

¶8

Through: Appearance not given.

¶9

CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R % 18.12.2024

¶11

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶12

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for refund of the pre-deposit amount of Rs. 5,96,000/- paid by the Petitioner along with interest in terms of Circular No. 984/08/2014-CX dated 16th September, 2014 issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs.

¶13

On the last date of hearing i.e., 27th November, 2024, the Court had issued notice and the same was accepted by the ld. Counsel for the Respondents. Further, time was sought by the ld. Counsel for the Respondents to seek instructions and if necessary, file a counter affidavit.

¶14

Today, the ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that in this matter, an order has been passed by the Inland Container Depot (ICD), Patparganj, Delhi on 13^th December, 2024. A copy of the said order has been handed over today

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 12:15:39

¶17

and the same is taken on record. The operative portion of the said order read as under:

¶18

“I, hereby, sanction an amount of Rs.5,96,000/- (Five Lacs and Ninety-Six Thousand Only) as refund of predeposit along with interest of Rs.2,38,563/-/- (Two Lacs Thirty-Eight Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Three Only) to M/s Innovative Crafts which will be paid through RTGS.”

¶19

In view of the above, the ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the present writ is infructuous.

¶20

Accordingly, the writ is disposed of as infructuous in view of the order dated 13^th December, 2024 passed by the Inland Container Depot (ICD), Patparganj.

¶21

The amount which has been sanctioned for refund in the said order of Inland Container Depot (ICD), Patparganj, shall be paid within a period of 8 weeks.

¶22

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

¶23

AMIT SHARMA, J.

¶24

DECEMBER 18, 2024

¶25

Rahul/ms

¶26

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 12:15:39

M/S Innovative Crafts v. Deputy Commissioner of Customs (Refund), Inland Container Depot, Patparganj, New Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Innovative Crafts v. Deputy Commissioner of Customs (Refund), Inland Container Depot, Patparganj, New Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Delhi Brush Manufacturing Association Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Jagdish Kumar Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Smt. Neelam Sathi Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Shri Upkar Singh Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Dr R S Gupta Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Others

Siya Ram Vs Delhi Development Authority

Manju Rani & Ors. Vs Boxing Federation of India and Others

Ravinder Kaur Vs Delhi Development Authority

Rattan Singh Vs Union of India & Anr.

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Trade and Taxes

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Trade and Taxes

The Commisioner of Central Tax, Cgst Delhi East Vs M/S Jmd Limited

Parvinder Singh Vs Union of India & Anr.

Kamran Farooqui Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. & Ors.