Mukish v. State (Nct of Delhi)
Case brief
What is this about?
Allowed an application to modify bail conditions, permitting the petitioner to furnish cash surety of Rs. 10,000 instead of personal sureties as he could not arrange the latter.
What did the court decide?
Modified order dated 31.07.2023 and 14.11.2023 to allow release on cash surety of Rs. 10,000 instead of personal sureties.
What the court decided
$~7
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 3776/2023
- MUKISH ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Tara Narula, Ms. Priya Sahil and Mr. Anirudh Ramanathan, Advocates
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for the State with Mr. Kunal Mittal, Mr. Arjit Sharma, Ms. Rishika, Advocates and SI Seema, P.S. Badarpur
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
- O R D E R
- % 29.01.2024
CRL.M.A. 35093/2023 (exemption)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can be released on cash surety instead of two personal sureties given financial inability.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mukish
- respondent
State (NCT of Delhi)
Coram
Swarana Kanta Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court