Rajesh Kumar v. Chajjan Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court modified an order suspending the petitioner's sentence in a cheque dishonour case. The court quashed the requirement to deposit 25% of the fine, acknowledging the petitioner had already deposited 20%. The order relied on Supreme Court precedents regarding the discretionary nature of depositing fines under Section 148 NI Act but failed to address the 5% discrepancy explicitly.
What did the court decide?
The order suspending the sentence was modified to reflect the petitioner's deposit of 20% of the compensation amount.
What the court decided
$~36
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 3587/2023, CRL.M.A. 13612/2023
RAJESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Advocate.
versus
CHAJJAN SINGH .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R % 11.09.2024
- The present petition has been filed to assail the order dated 08.05.2023 passed in Crl. A. No.100/2023 by ASJ-05, North West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi. The present petition arises out of proceedings under Section 138 of N.I. Act filed on behalf of the respondent in which the petitioner was convicted vide judgement dated 31.03.2023 and vide order on sentence dated 28.04.2024 sentenced to one month of simple imprisonment and fine of Rs. 13,90,000/-. The Appellate Court vide the impugned order suspended the sentence subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the fine amount.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellate court's requirement to deposit 25% of the fine under Section 148 NI Act as amended was reasoned and justified.
Whether the appellate court erred in failing to record specific reasons for the percentage of fine deposited under Section 148 NI Act.
Whether the petitioner was entitled to relief given the modification of the deposit requirement after he already deposited 20%.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajesh Kumar
- respondent
Chajan Singh
Coram
Manoj Kumar Ohri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court