Allowed

Mohd. Anish & Ors. v. State & Ors.

Delhi HC11 Sept 2024CRL.M.C./2796/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi quashed FIR No. 206/2016 and consequent proceedings against petitioners for sections 308/323/34 IPC. The Court allowed condonation of delay for refiling the petition and directed quashing due to an amicable settlement entered by parties before the Delhi Mediation Centre without coercion.

What did the court decide?

The aforesaid FIR No. 206/2016 and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed and the petition is disposed of.

Mohd. Anish & Ors. Vs State & Ors. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~29

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 2796/2023

¶4

MOHD. ANISH & ORS. .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Ms.Deepika and Ms.Renu Kuhar, Advocates with petitioners in person

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Kishore Ms.Rashi Rampal and Ms.Prachi Singh, Advocates for respondent Nos.2 to 6 with respondent Nos.2 to 4 in person in person respondent Nos.5 and 6 through V.C.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

¶9

O R D E R % 11.09.2024

¶10

CRL.M.A. 10512/2023 (delay in filing)

¶11

By way of present application, the petitioner seeks condonation of delay of 89 days in refiling the petition.

¶12

Issue notice.

¶13

Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 6 accept notice.

¶14

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 89 days in refiling the petition is condoned.

¶15

The application is disposed of.

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:23:31

¶17

CRL.M.C. 2796/2023

¶18

The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.206/2016 registered under Sections 308/323/34 IPC at P.S. Vasant Kunj, New Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

¶19

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioners caused several injuries to the respondents by striking them with wooden sticks.

¶20

Learned APP for the State submits that in the present case the petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent Nos.2 to 6 are the complainants/victims. He further submits that the parties are related to each other.

¶21

Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a settlement on 19.02.2020, before Delhi Mediation Centre, Patiala House Court, New Delhi and modified the terms of the aforementioned settlement vide order dated 25.04.2022, a copy whereof has been placed on record. In terms of the settlement, respondent No.2 is now left with no claim or grievance whatsoever against the petitioners.

¶22

The petitioners and respondent Nos.2 to 4, who are present in the Court and respondent Nos.5 and 6, who have joined the proceedings through V.C., have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer.

¶23

The petitioners have shown remorse for their conduct and they undertake not to repeat the same in future. Respondent Nos.2 to 6 state that they have entered into the aforesaid mediation settlement out of their own free will, volition and without any coercion. They further state that they have no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are

¶24

¶25

quashed.

¶26

Learned counsels for the parties submit that there is another connected FIR being FIR No.210/2016 registered under Sections 451/354/354A/354B/34 IPC at P.S. Vasant Kunj (North), Delhi, which has also been quashed vide today’s order passed in CRL.M.C. 6560/2024.

¶27

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

¶29

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

¶30

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of.

¶31

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶32

SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 na

¶33

This is a digitally signed order.

¶34

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:23:31

Mohd. Anish & Ors. v. State & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Anish & Ors. v. State & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Nanda Vs State & Anr.

Anil Gosain Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ashu & Ors. Vs State of Nct, Delhi & Anr.

Nazim Choudhry Vs State NCT of Delhi

Shabbeer Gullu & Ors. Vs State Gnctd Concerned SHO Ps Vasant Kunj North & Ors.

Somadila Hilary Vs State