The Delhi High Court disposed of a habeas corpus petition filed by the father of a missing person. The missing individual had returned voluntarily before the hearing, leading the petitioner to abandon the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
SUNDER SINGH YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv. (M :9870516269 )
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms. Priyam Aggarwal & Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Advs., for State. with Insp. Balram and SI Ravi PS Sagar Pur.
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
CRL.M.A. 33902/2024 (exemption)
W.P.(CRL) 3546/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:28:23
Court. The said status report is taken on record.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
AMIT SHARMA, J.
NOVEMBER 13, 2024 dk/bh
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:28:23
Sunder Singh Yadav
State of NCT of Delhi
Prathiba M. Singh
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
