Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue other available remedies. The court granted liberty, dismissed the petition as withdrawn, and disposed of pending applications as infructuous.
Leave granted to withdraw petition with liberty to pursue other remedies; pending applications disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~70
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
LOKESH SHARMA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nitin Saluja, Ms. Asmita Narula and Ms. Sanskriti Bansal, Advs.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State, Mr. Nishank Tripathi, Ms. Harshita Sukhija, Ms. Palak Jain, Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar & Ms. Chavi Lazarus, Advocates
Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Mr. Ajit Sharma and Ms. Sanskriti Gupta, Advs. for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R % 14.11.2024
ANISH DAYAL, J
NOVEMBER 14, 2024/sm/ kp
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:13:32
LOKESH SHARMA
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
ANISH DAYAL
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
