Petitioner sought furlough. Court noted prior parole grants and pending trial elsewhere. No legal impediment found. Furlough granted for three weeks with conditions.
Petitioner enlarged on furlough for three weeks conditioned on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety, reporting to SHO weekly, and surrendering at expiry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
DAL CHAND .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate.
versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC(CRL.) for State along with Ms. Charu Sharma, Mr. Arjit Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Mr. Nikunj Bindal, Advocates & Insp. Arun Kumar, PS: Adarsh Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 03.12.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2024 at 12:21:59
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2024 at 12:21:59
ANISH DAYAL, J
DECEMBER 3, 2024/ ak/tk
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2024 at 12:21:59
1 issue framed by the court
Whether furlough can be granted to a petitioner serving a long sentence despite pending implicating offences in another jurisdiction.
DAL CHAND
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
ANISH DAYAL
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
