Petitioners sought quashing of a matrimonial-dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC after settling disputes via MoU. The complainant's brother confirmed voluntary settlement and receipt of the settled amount. Finding no useful purpose in continuing proceedings, the court quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
RAVI KUMAR & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Abhishek Goswami, Advocate with petitioners in person.
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for State with SI Prince PS Mandawali, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 20.05.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 12:40:54
minor daughters born out of the wedlock, are in the present custody of the petitioner No.1, who has undertaken to provide for them.
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
MAY 20, 2024/ rd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 12:40:54
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No. 0610/2010 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC could be quashed following an amicable settlement between the parties.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ravi Kumar & Ors.
The State NCT of Delhi
Respondent No. 2
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
