Dismissed
Rajeev Kumar v. the State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/2913/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77
Through: Mr. R.K. Tarun, Ms. Aditi Shivadhatri and Capt. Subedita Rani, Advs.
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Adv. SI Jaipal Singh, PS Kotwali.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R % 12.01.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition in view of proposed settlement between the parties and since the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred on behalf of the respondent for quashing of the proceedings.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J. JANUARY 12, 2024 /akc
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 15:20:23
Rajeev Kumar
The State of NCT of Delhi
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court